Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Test Server Discussion

  Index

  • Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 15. 2011 23:02

SkSSoldier
I have just completed testing/comparing the SN DB/TB Damages. Many thanks to Poage, my
fleetmate and fleet CO from Digital Anarchy Fleet of Bismarck Server. This test would have
been very boring and slow without you.

Below is a list of TB/DB damages corresponding to their titles:
(All damages incurred on the midsection of a nonmoving CV5 with 0 bulge, 0 armor and 900 SD)

SN TB_____UK TB_____MN TB===SN DB------UK DB------MN DB
7139______6452______8259====4241--------0869--------4267
7174______6597______7823====3208--------3400--------2859
7253______7084______8061====4477--------3274--------4047
7457______6325______8061====4238--------3382--------2891
7486______6682______8319====4432--------3216--------3884
7611______6555______7374====4554--------3291--------4178
7115______6756______8233====4390--------3456--------3811
6637______6626______7725====1219--------3427--------3205
7555______6344______7625====4376--------2412--------4356
7208______6035______7906====4173--------3528--------2985

As you can see, UK TBs are no longer king of the sea. They are now out damaged by both SN
and MN TBs (both of the new nations).

SN DBs are slightly stronger than the MN DBs. UK DBs suck.
MN TBs are considerably stronger than SN(~800) and UK (~1600)


SN = strongest DBs (Testing KM soon), 2nd strongest TBs
MN = 2nd strongest DBs, strongest TBs
UK=/=BW nation (worst DBs, now average TBs).
[KM, US FPs > UK FPs, what is the role/advantage of UK CVs now?]
  Index

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 13:52

V2CxBongRipz
"^^and yes, the uk fps' advantage was their durability, which is why many people
previously used t2s (which had more durability). but now that bomber stat is deactivated
and t4s have come out, none of that really matters. "

Correction... T2s NOW have more durability.

"We will be adjusting SN values to NFNA... same as with MN when we will go over that... "

Does this include MN PCV with its 12 launch capability?

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 13:31

SkSSoldier
haha sorry if it seems like i'm complaining, but i actually wasnt trying to do anything of
the sort, nor was that any of my intention. I'm just posting damages of each of the
bombers so the devs can have an easier time deciding the balance when the stats are
adjusted to nfna while adhering to the pros and cons of the original nations.

^^and yes, the uk fps' advantage was their durability, which is why many people
previously used t2s (which had more durability). but now that bomber stat is deactivated
and t4s have come out, none of that really matters.

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 13:22

V2CxBongRipz
Actually SkSSoldier, All fighters were balanced at one point. MN was later added with NFKR
stats which made them very weak for NFNA play style. The most recent CV patch that
eliminated Bomber stat as defense for all planes and Fighter stat as attack for all planes
was what screwed things up for UK/IJN.

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 12:27

shira
As mailman said , SN and MN will adjust to NFNA balance .
That mean , UK will get strongest TB again . MN is 3rd. and SN is worst .
KM will have some problem , their DB out dameged by SN one , their TB is weak (no
longer worst )

What were you complaned for UK CV ?

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 07:47

SkSSoldier
Also, please remember why nearly every UK cv player chose to get a UK CV - TBs. UK TBs
were essentially the only good thing about UK aircraft (DBs suck, FPs are mediocre).

If both new nations overpower UK in TBs (as they do in the test server), there will no
longer be any advantages UK players have over the area of bombing.

I will be posting the result of the KM DB/TB test to mainly compare the DB damage of the
new nations' DB vs. the old nations' best DB

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 07:00

mailman
We will be adjusting SN values to NFNA... same as with MN when we will go over that...

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 03:04

Spenat123
if it will be UK=/=BW nation (worst DBs, now average TBs). so they can delete UK CV

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 16. 2011 01:02

V2CxBongRipz
Also consider that on NFNA things like SD and Repair are capped unlike on NFKR making NFKR
stat bombers superpowered on NFNA.

  • Re : Soviet Navy CVs --- TB/DB Damage Test(Comparison)

    01. 15. 2011 23:50

shira
I think Mailman is ready to adjust SN and MN bombers ...
Now their bomb damege is NFKR data . CV's charactor in NFKR have far more like real
Naval War , their main job is detroy enemy ship . Bomber planes always have far
more feul then fighters .

Aircraft in NFNA is more like to provide fighter cover and scout , our fighters have far
more feul then NFKR , and bomber nerf a lot from NFKR .

I think we should adjust MN and SN bombers to fit NFNA balance . MN have
averange DB and TB in NFKR , their DB have 4th. damege in NFKR and TB is 3rd.
(NFKR have 6 nation) . SN bomber in NFKRhave the best DB damege and worst TB
damege .
1