Quite honestly; Bomber pilot stats don't have a huge effect on pilots. Plane stats
however do.

On top of that, you need to take into account that NFNA is fighter heavy.

Also; the difference between high and low planespace per tier isn't going to be a
huge amount.

Fighters are not the only thing to look at when balancing the CVs themselves Lukas. And
you cant just look at fighters if you want to do it by aircraft. Bombers are just as
important in those terms. That is however the wrong way to look at things Instead that
should be done independently of aircraft and comparing the stats of the boats themselves.
Stats like Turning force, DP, Durability, Plane Space, Guns, Speed, and Displacement.

Would welcome a nerf to US CV Planespace; Personally, planespace should be:-

IJN>UK>SN>>MN>KM>US

(Given end game fighter pilot stats; SN only have ace like IJN and UK and also do not
have +2 in fighter, only bomber.)

That is true. That came in the ONF CV patch. Anyway I have no objection to bumping SN
CV3/4 planespace up abit the only reason I brought up the gun thing was because aside from
GZ2 all KM cvs have very nice gunslots to balance out their low planespace. In reality
small adjustments are trivial anyway. The difference between Essex and GZ2 for example is
only 8 T3 fighter planes anyway.

Though KM CV4 was meant to have the lowest plane space (according to KR stats), it still
got a plane space buff in NFNA, from 6920 -> 7400.

"Plus, CV3 & CV4s are going to be used in fleet leagues, therefore I think we should make
sure that SN isn't handicapped unnecessarily on those terms. "

Like KM you mean? :P

For a CV in NFNA, plane space is a very important stat given our fighter heavy history,
I'd say it's definitely more important than gunslot placements.

Considering SN is supposed to have "good CV stat" as a national trait, having the second
lowest plane space doesn't make much sense.

Plus, CV3 & CV4s are going to be used in fleet leagues, therefore I think we should make
sure that SN isn't handicapped unnecessarily on those terms.

As long as they arnt stupidly low like PCV/CV6 were I dont see a major problem with that.
Especially if they have decent gunslots.

SN CV3 and CV4's plane spaces need a buff as well.

Atm they are ranked second-to-last, between KM and UK.

Actually, wasn't the Charlemagne done by the test team, and the MN T3's (As with the CV
patch) done by Blade and his test group?