|
So if the stats are correct...
US Version:
"SPECIFICATION
Type BattleShip
Cost 2056000
Req.Level 61
Durability 20100
Normal Disp. 8454 t
Standard Disp. 23606 t
Maximum Disp. 29000 t
Turning Force 23
Structual Str. 126
AAW Defence 201
Overheat Ratio 30 %
LOADING CAPACITY
FCS 105
Engine 73
Aircraft Loading Capacity 160
Number of Aircraft Take Off 1
Torpedo & Aircraft Weapon Loading Capacity 0
ARMAMENT
ARM.1 350 ARM.2 63 ARM.3 63 ARM.4 350 ARM.5 63
ARM.6 63 ARM.7 63 ARM.8 63 ARM.9 350 ARM.10 63
ARM.11 63 ARM.12 350
Soviet Version:
SPECIFICATION
Type BattleShip
Cost 2056000
Req.Level 61
Durability 20100
Normal Disp. 10543 t
Standard Disp. 20207 t
Maximum Disp. 29000 t
Turning Force 23
Structual Str. 126
AAW Defence 201
Overheat Ratio 30 %
LOADING CAPACITY
FCS 110
Engine 223
Aircraft Loading Capacity 160
Number of Aircraft Take Off 1
Torpedo & Aircraft Weapon Loading Capacity 0
ARMAMENT
ARM.1 323 ARM.2 84 ARM.3 84 ARM.4 323 ARM.5 84
ARM.6 84 ARM.7 84 ARM.8 84 ARM.9 323 ARM.10 84
ARM.11 84 ARM.12 323
That is stat wise... So right off the bat... FCS is much better on the USSR version. The
turning force, structural strength, AAW is all the same... A standard displacement is a
tad lower for USSR and Engine seems a bit better too for the USSR. A tiny bit less R
slots but a bit more space for T slots...
So it looks like it might have 1 less bind I guess than the US version but can carry a bit
more AA so AA seems a definite possibility to use. Might be a bit more accurate but the
gunner difference might set it off. However, it could have better range and bit more
power if it follows the Soviet Nation trait.
Any other thoughts people?
* Sorry one last edit *
Gunner part could be wrong... It probably will be the same or a bit better but with much
better reload unless they really tweak the guns.
|