If there's ever a tournament again who's outcome hinges on which side sank the
most tactical, it would be nice if it were fixed before that. Not a priority, but
definately something you want to be fixed.

Remember the Vanguard incident.

Well you're absolutely right in that it needs to be fixed, however, prioritizing it as a
rush-fix is ridiculous considering all the other things that are horribly wrong that
affect gameplay. I'm sure we'll get some decent suggestions and the number will
eventually be changed to something more appropriate.

I mean none of them are in the server yet.
it might be an easy adjustment now.
and i am just making an observation , and one simple suggestion,
i am not trying to rush/push anything.

It may not need to be rushed to fix, but might as well fix it when we can.

MN will be adjusted most likely when it is on the testing table

I don't see the problem considering that the MN BB5 has a similar cost as Rehor
mentioned earlier in this thread.

This is also true of MN aircraft, so I assume SN is the same. A plane's cost directly
influences the reward for shooting it down.

The Alsace is the same. What does it matter rushing a fix?

That is something that was definitely over looked.

I'll see if I can get a value for it so it can be changed asap.