"After MN we will be combining fighter rework and BB5's into 1 project. "
its nice to see the will to rework fighters finally

uhh,.hmmm since ima h44 user for about a year, i dont actualy have a prob with it, i love
it as long as ur team works with u,. its always a teamwork that boosts up ur skills with
any ship u use,.

but i want to give h44 faster reload,.LOL

and lessen the angle to 35,.woot!! ^^,

I see your concerns, and we will definately need to be extremely careful in what we do.

MM

Oh God here we go, everyone's "perfect" ideas are going to revolutionize the BB5's and
break them stupid.

After MN we will be combining fighter rework and BB5's into 1 project.

I see a LionII sitting there on 15k DP repairing, I know that with 1 decent salvo I can
finish him off but in order to do that I will most likely catch a large chunk of his salvo
but it is a decent trade off.

I rush in, fire a full salvo and it all hits him doing about 20k damage due to
inconsistant damage, he shoots and hits me down to low SD and I am in trouble as he is
still alive and have sacrificed my whole SD for nothing.

Which part of that hypothetical scenario makes sense? When I rush I want to KNOW that if
he isn't AWed I have a guaranteed full salvo damage, not anythng between 10k and 40k.

"OT, is the inconsistent damage really a bug?"

>>> Yes. This game is meant to be skill based, not luck based.

If so, how can balance be achieved by buffing/nerfing different aspects of a ship? No point
discussing balance if the ships don't perform as intended anyway."

>>> You can still discuss changes assuming the bug wasn't there.

We're getting daggers now? Sweet... can't wait for the next CV only room...

OT, is the inconsistent damage really a bug? If so, how can balance be achieved by
buffing/nerfing different aspects of a ship? No point discussing balance if the ships
don't perform as intended anyway.

Facts are better.

Opinions are lovely aren't they?