Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

General Discussion

  Index

  • Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 07. 2011 19:34

vanity
After catching a fleet mate telling the host to go with a pcv and a cv1 in a gb2, it
made
me realise - do people simply not care about balance anymore?

Cast your vote; I will update as each page goes.

Wait for a balanced game or go as soon as you can.



To clarify, we are just talking about GB2 here.

Results:
I stopped counting since there are a lot of opinions posted that are not binary
answers.

However, for those interested it seems the majority are for fast games, although
there are still a reasonable number of people who would rather wait for more CV's -
whether it be for balance or merely for the hope that it will mean there is 1 cv for
each teams flanks.
  Index

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 28. 2011 11:13

Ultra_Dog
I am for a quick start.

I am for balanced games (alpha vs bravo). I don't care if there are 2, 4, 6, or 22
CVs. I find too many BBs more a problem, than too few CVs.

Why can't NF developers come up with a basic Autostart feature? Dump the host
and have the system auto generate rooms (GB2, GB1, CA/BB, BB only, Blitz, CV Only)
and have them available for any player to enter, with an auotstart at some pre-
determined mix of players or some timer countdown. It cannot be that hard to
design and implement.

Rebalance all the rooms so that exp earned is equal and players do not gravitate to
one room or another due to the reward at the end. All games should be equal in
reward (exp) for the actions of the player. Eliminate all shared exp for ships CA and
above.

Nobody really cares about the flagship as a game item. What they want is a room
that starts quick, provides fun and engagement and decent exp reward. GB2 is a
BB game, CVs are only necessary due to the flag requirement. Everyone else is just
food for some BB.

The flagship concept is interesting, but it has become predictable and routine, with
CV players complaining about being flag, to other players moaning about some flag
getting sunk and name calling.

FInd a way to push most BBs into BB only games. Today, there is not a good
enough incentive to move them out of GB rooms.

Ask a BB player what they hate most? (answer: SS)

Ask them why they don't play in BB only games (answer: not enough exp).

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 27. 2011 00:31

Ur_0gag
fast=bilis

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 27. 2011 00:05

eXit
Faster

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 27. 2011 00:02

ExSol
Fast games for me

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 27. 2011 00:01

SadisticOne
fast

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 23. 2011 11:39

GeneralSJG
Balanced....
Unbalanced = fast and poor xp

:)

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 23. 2011 00:46

Elliot2lazy
I'm bumping this cause I think this is a really good point and discussion even though I
didn't create it.

Crazy fast games would be nice. I think 5-6 games/hr would be nice, instead of 1-4.
Expecially since most people on Kaiser server play for fun. For a serious player it would
be a lot more fun than waiting 5-6 minutes only to have most of your team playing for fun
instead having the eye of the tiger and wanting to win (I know Rocky reference but it is
a good reference).

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 10. 2011 19:54

jigoyski
Fast games if the rooms are nearly full/or at 9mins

But for most part,

Balanced or try to be (6-8cvs) if first 4 cvs are different tiers (3 pcvs and 1 cv2, it
will give a slight advantage to the team that gets the 2 pcvs even if those 2 pcvs are
known to fail)

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 10. 2011 19:07

Audessy
Because most of this game is about waiting. What's the point with all the flagship
disconnections? You wait 9 minutes for a battle to start and the battle lasts 5 minutes.

  • Re : Fast games or balanced games? - vote

    04. 10. 2011 17:14

dercomandan
Waiting for balance is best but nobody has any patience any more!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7