"And I'm sure SDE will allow us to make changes to the Alsace and Sovietsky during the BB5 patch, so why not try something when we can? "
*Is losing the will to live*
Because Angus, you don't just sit there on your own sweet jolly arse thinking up magical scenarios you want to see. Before ALL changes there are discussions, long lengthy discussions where a number of things happen:
1. Retards post and after a few pages get bored because everyone ignores their stupid ideas and tells them to get lost.
2. Clever people post and debate with each other what should happen, eventually they will start to compromise and at the end you end up with something that everyone is reasonably happy with.
3. Now that you have the basic premise of what you want to do, you find a grunt and you get him to do a bit of number crunching. This gives you a proposal.
Now, what is the problem with missing this all out you might say? I just want to experiment and see what happens. Firstly, if said content is overpowered, EVERYONE will use it and ignore other gunsets. If it is underpowered, NO-ONE will use it. Theres your experiment right there, screwing up the rest of the balancing tests because lets face it, we all love dicking around with overpowered content once in a while.
Secondly, what happens when we come to balance the other lvl 110 guns and SDE turns around and tells us that due to your "experiment" the MN/SN 110 guns are being left as they are because you have already made changes to them. What then?
You still don't get this balancing lark Angus, you don't just do stuff on a whim and you don't do stuff unless you are damn sure it isn't going to need changing in the future. This isn't a 5 minute fix kinda thing. This is 10 very clever people thrashing out proposals, or it should be at least. We all know what it is at the minute.
|