I think I missed some more infomation of this .
Now Alaska seems like a penalty to player who choose Brooklyn-South Dakota line . Grind on Alaska is always painful , not because it's a weak ship , because it don't really have capability of a BB1 . It have crap range , even ranged by some CA (not PCA) . It have less DP in BB1 with super big hitbox . 4 support slot is a pain , maybe it's a reasonalbe weak point in the past , but now we have NCA with more support slot . And more and more CA have better combat capability then Alaska (speed , range , damege out put , anti- aircraft) . We know Alsaka have super AAW ability , but this didn't work . Alaska have good speed , but lot of BB1-3 can do better , and have better turning force then Alaska .
Alaska count as BB in any room , and even with high level crew , it's hard(not impossible , but you know how hard this is) for Alaska to work as a BB1 .
In my opinion , if classified Alaska without change make it overpower , we can do some nerf to it , make it become a "special one" , like P project I or Rurik . We can nerf it reload time , range , and/or accuracy to nerf it's damege out put to CA level (I know nerf shell damege will also effect Guam) , nerf it's usable didplacement and/or ammor weight to prevent AW with 8" gun or super speed . nerf DP to let it as fragile as CA .
Or just buff Alaska as BB1 by +1 support slot and range buff , buff Guam to BB2 .
|