Bit big and impractical I think. Would be an easy target and surely cant fire guns while launching aircraft. Or store enough aircraft to justify 2 decks. Or move very fast, or be very stable when firing all guns.

Looks cool though :)

to answer that benser33 we need some info on wich ship is, displacement, size, engine/s, etc etc... 

Seems a reasonable project to dominate all alone an entire ocean. 

TNF's new monster ship?

The turrets and stacks are classic IJN design, for whatever that's worth.

Useless design:

Gun fire blasts will damage planes and the flight deck.
Long, straight flight deck inefficient compared to angled deck.
The usual reason a battleship got bigger, was so that it would have more displacement for larger guns, and not more guns. (Eg, why would I put 27 8" guns on a montana?)
3 Bridges is a waste of displacement, not to mention exaust from the smokestacks would blind any men on the rear bridges.
Case mate side guns have been shown in WWI to be inefficient (low max angle), and easily take on water during rough seas.
Distance between boilers (beneath smoke stacks) to the rear of the ship is very great, it's inefficient to have a shaft bringing power that far back. (eg, IJN Tone had 4 turrets in front, 0 in back)
Like the others have said, bigger ship=bigger target, would be the first to be targeted in any battle. 

Why can't you all just be imaginitive :P

First Thing I Just want To Share The Pic With All Navyfield Fan.I Dont Said That The Ship Was A Real Thing OR IJN Super Carrier.But If Ijn Do IT Cost 100 billion +++..Its Really Weird When Someone Argued About This Pic :P