We will have different opinions on how and why the balance is unfair. Some might look at the total number of ships, others will look at classes.
But one thing we could throw back at SDE is the explanation the Psychohove and Vick11 gave me before.
Back in the day(Pre MN/CV/BB/Hybrid in blitz) , when Manual Balance was still possible, myself and a few others would stack blitz against ourselves. I would place 3 frigates, a CL, and a CA vs 15-20 ships on the other team. Of course the other team was outraged but we'd still win about 80% of those games.
People even came onto the forum to complain about it not to mention report us for it. When I explained the nature of the balance and showed screenshots of how most games ended in a 2vs1 or 3vs1 type situation, TNF said it was okay and I was allowed to continue.
The ones who took it publicly were ridiculed and told~ you lost with 15+ ships, mostly of higher class. You should be ashamed to even mention it.
Eventually I was asked to stop and the reason given was that we would often put our 1CA vs 3 or more + a large number of CLs on the team. XP was not fair for the other team. I knew they gave into the complaints but it was still a fair explanation.
So now we have auto balance giving one team 3bb/cv and the other team 1 cv or bb. Is this not the unfair higher tier XP situation that was used as an explanation to stop my 5 vs 15 games? So going back to what we were told then, should this not be fixed immediately or was it just a convenient reason yanked out of the rear? It would be nice if Vick or Psycho had a response.