PST Time 00:00:00GMT-8
Local Server Time 00:00:00GMT+8
ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Suggestions
Forum Quick Menu

  Index

  • HA declaration change.

    11. 09. 2013 23:46

Recommend : 3

L0TTERY

I think we should raise the limit of minimum accounts required to declare a Harbour Assault. This is the 4th HA that a fleet has brought less than required players, and the 2nd time during an event. It is a waste of time against players in both fleets on weekends and especially during events.

 

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 04:33


Thebarrel

if this is such a major problem then how can you lose against these so called "illegal" harbour declarations as you can them? 

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 05:07


devildog2

where did they lose? looks like NH still has the harbor

just saying 

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 05:26


Thebarrel

Originally Posted by devildog2

where did they lose? looks like NH still has the harbor

just saying 



not talking about nighthawkz the fleet that attacked nhz seems to have had enough members and has been formed some time ago no idea about the numbers the fleet attacking nhz had but u cant judge based on preformance

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 06:20


Rehor

Here we go again.

Don't worry, Cracko will post soon.

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 06:23


Cracko

Originally Posted by Rehor

Here we go again.

Don't worry, Cracko will post soon.

How well you know me, baby

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 07:05


devildog2

Originally Posted by Thebarrel

Originally Posted by devildog2

where did they lose? looks like NH still has the harbor

just saying 



not talking about nighthawkz the fleet that attacked nhz seems to have had enough members and has been formed some time ago no idea about the numbers the fleet attacking nhz had but u cant judge based on preformance



gotcha sorry for the misunderstanding :)

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 11:18


woodskier

Originally Posted by Thebarrel

if this is such a major problem then how can you lose against these so called "illegal" harbour declarations as you can them? 


The post refers to illegal HA declaration. Not too the outcome of said HA.

Do you understand that ?..... or do we have a failure to communicate ? 

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 10. 2013 15:40


normpearii

FreeThaiMoveMent fleet had over 40 members in the rankings before declaring. Which is entirely legal.

So who are you talking about?

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 11. 2013 17:13


L0TTERY

Thai fleet maybe had 40 players in the rankings. During the HA itsself there were 2 battles with their "main" force. The rest was rabbits. There was also about 10 minutes of no rooms opening at all before I quit and went to bed. It was the same with Dioses and Chili Elite, if I remember the fleet name correctly. With a main force of 35, plus rabbits I don't think 40 is un-reasonable. I would personally like to see 50, that way there would atleast be one good fight within the 2 hours of waiting, but I understand the need to let smaller fleets try their hand. However, an unprepared fleet declaring just because they have the numbers is a waste of everybodys time.

  • Re : HA declaration change.

    11. 11. 2013 17:38


nyerkovic

If you have something to report, please report it, don't open threads.

The HA declaration change discussion is taking place in the fleet leaders forum. Please contact your fleet leader and express your opinions.

- Locked 

1