ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion

  Index

  • NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships

    02. 15. 2017 13:07


Celeste_Morn

After playing World of Warships a bit, I have come to the conclusion that NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships not because of submarines and if things are done right or correctly it could attract some of the World of Warships players, as people know World of Warships player base is really declining because Wargaming who developed World of Warships decided to remove some of the free content and making them overpriced premium content and the bad matchmaker in place as well

 

  • Re : NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships

    02. 15. 2017 18:13


ussnavy213

That's based on people can only play NF and wows,but we have lots of games.
I do agree on  if things are done right or correctly.
 

  • Re : NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships

    02. 15. 2017 21:36


Kongou

as people know World of Warships player base is really declining because Wargaming who developed World of Warships decided to remove some of the free content and making them overpriced premium content

 >All online games is doing the same, including this one which you're talking about.


 
bad matchmaker in place

>[Muffled Night of Fire in the distance]

  • Re : NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships

    02. 15. 2017 22:49


pyrofiendd

Originally Posted by Celeste_Morn

After playing World of Warships a bit, I have come to the conclusion that NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships not because of submarines and if things are done right or correctly it could attract some of the World of Warships players, as people know World of Warships player base is really declining because Wargaming who developed World of Warships decided to remove some of the free content and making them overpriced premium content and the bad matchmaker in place as well



Umm... No it does not. World of Warships playerbase is not declining; it's increasing. Server population can get up to around 14-16 thousand players on any given night. Navyfield gets up to around 50-100 players at most.

They did not remove any free content. No idea what you're talking about. At least WoWS has a matchmaker. We can only wish NF had one.

  • Re : NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships

    02. 15. 2017 23:56


Dakkadakka

I have said so, and will say it again - Navyfield NA with refined UI, automation, graphics, information and better promotion could rival WoWS for the best naval warfare experience online. 

It has nothing to do with WoWS's server population, or its matchmaking. NF needs to either get completely revamped, have all its major technical issues fixed and/or revise its graphics, then promote as aggressively as WoWS to get back on the top line. The bitter truth is that NFNA right now is not up to par with any modern MMO, and the sooner we stop clinging to the old glories, the better.

  • Re : NavyField has a better potential than World of Warships

    02. 16. 2017 00:04


ZechsII

The only thing thats good in NF is the manual aiming and the nation cons and pros.. They F**** up NF2 big time.. I also agree with the things if done correctly.

WoWS sea server has a staggering population than na i guess, because last time  I logged on NA has around 6k whereelse SEA has 15k+ or more.

Offtopic: If Steel Ocean has a graphics tied up with WoWS and with a decent player base I guess it will be a match up of whos gonna lose first.

1