|
|
-
About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 20. 2012 15:21
V2CxBongRipz
|
Wheres the busted myths? When wes the AWW dosnt work "myth" disproven? Having information in a sticky that was never proven is very misleading.
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 20. 2012 16:17
KingCong
|
even if the myths were "plausible" or being debated, it should be noted in the sticky as such or be removed completely until a definitive answer is determined.
I find that irresponsible.
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 23. 2012 02:26
ljsevern
|
Completely agree V2, that comment regarding AAW in the Mythbusters sticky needs to be removed.
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 23. 2012 03:18
Sindher
|
Another quality post from V2 that deserved its own thread.
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 23. 2012 07:23
V2CxBongRipz
|
Everything I say deserves its own thread. ;D
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 23. 2012 07:23
AndrusN
|
I think the reasoning is, that when people where talking about that stat, it was handed down from the DEV's that it was reactivated, to a extent. So I think that is why it was posted on there.
Still, it should not be posted until it is busted, confirmed, or deemed plausible(which I don't think there should be, cause that is saying that it can be or can't be, there is no room for that in this, it either needs to be proved or disproved, no half measures)
Just saying.........................................................................................
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 23. 2012 10:34
ljsevern
|
Originally Posted by AndrusN
I think the reasoning is, that when people where talking about that stat, it was handed down from the DEV's that it was reactivated, to a extent. So I think that is why it was posted on there.
Still, it should not be posted until it is busted, confirmed, or deemed plausible(which I don't think there should be, cause that is saying that it can be or can't be, there is no room for that in this, it either needs to be proved or disproved, no half measures)
Just saying.........................................................................................
It is the language difference. The dev's had said that AAW is partially activated (which is true, the ship stat is active, the sailor stat isn't), and then instead of testing and speaking to the people that know, people make silly statements completely missing the meaning of what the Dev's meant. These things happen, but I still don't understand why it hasn't been corrected.
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 23. 2012 12:57
AndrusN
|
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Originally Posted by AndrusN
I think the reasoning is, that when people where talking about that stat, it was handed down from the DEV's that it was reactivated, to a extent. So I think that is why it was posted on there.
Still, it should not be posted until it is busted, confirmed, or deemed plausible(which I don't think there should be, cause that is saying that it can be or can't be, there is no room for that in this, it either needs to be proved or disproved, no half measures)
Just saying.........................................................................................
It is the language difference. The dev's had said that AAW is partially activated (which is true, the ship stat is active, the sailor stat isn't), and then instead of testing and speaking to the people that know, people make silly statements completely missing the meaning of what the Dev's meant. These things happen, but I still don't understand why it hasn't been corrected.
Yea, that is pretty much where I was coming from. It needs to be reworded or just all together needs to be proven/disproved.
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 27. 2012 05:28
ljsevern
|
Bump
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 27. 2012 07:48
Sindher
|
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Bump
Why bump this useless thread? V2 should ask his question in the actual discussion instead of posting crap. http://navyfield.com/Community/Forum/View.aspx?num=6745&searchtype=0&pagecount=0&searchvalue=&sort=5&category=C01&page1=1
|
-
Re : About NF Mythbusters facts
01. 27. 2012 09:11
ljsevern
|
Originally Posted by Sindher
Originally Posted by ljsevern
Bump
Why bump this useless thread? V2 should ask his question in the actual discussion instead of posting crap. http://navyfield.com/Community/Forum/View.aspx?num=6745&searchtype=0&pagecount=0&searchvalue=&sort=5&category=C01&page1=1
The question was asked in the thread countless times and ignored. I also bumped that thread
|
|
|
