LoL...

from what i understand is the New T5s when released is going to be lvl110 Ftrs but if you want more info check the test forums

T5 FP are the old T4s.
the new T4s are whats being added.
request lock.

1. not general discussion as your title says it a suggestion so it goes in the suggestion area.
2. fighters are being looked at for a general rebalance see test server section
3. moved to correct area

Here is a fighter list I think should be in game. Note at the momnent I can only think of the orignal nations (us, uk, germany and japan) someone else has to do research and fill in the list for the French, Soviets and eventually Italy. Tier 4 fighters would get a nerf so that they would be somewhere between tier 3 and current tier 4 performance. Tier 5 fighters would be given tier 5 status and most likely be only on tier 6 carriers.

Some fighters would be moved up a tier while others get replaced
This post is a streamlined version of the new carrier fighter and bomber rooster for the orignal nations suggestion that i made
http://navyfield.com/Community/Forum/View.aspx?num=6077&searchtype=0&pagecount=0&searchvalue=&sort=5&category=D02&page1=4
US Fighters:
Tier 1: F2A Buffalo
Tier 2: F2F Wildcat
Tier 3 F6F Hellcat
Tier 4: F4U Corsair
Tier 5: F8F-1 Bearcat

UK Fighters:
Tier 1:Sea Gladiator
Tier 2: Sea Hurricane
Tier 3: Sea Fire
Tier 4: Seafang
Tier 5: Sea Fury

IJN Fighters:
Tier 1: A5M4 type 96
Tier 2: A6M2 Model 21 Zero
Tier 3: N1K1-J Model 11
Tier 4: A7M3 Type 11 Sam
Tier 5: Ki-84-Ia Hayate

KM Fighters:
Tier 1: Ar 197
Tier 2: Bf 109T
Tier 3: Bv 155
Tier 4: Fw 190A
Tier 5: Ta 152C-1

KM Ta 152C-1 ; 43 made ...ever. Good choice.

it just isnt rite usa gets to dog us for a year or 2 now, with thier P-51's.and your saying they are just going to cont on
with it.thats just not rite. whats with haveing game balance than when 1 nation has best speed/fuel/attack/& deffence ?
how do u balance that? you gona give other nations thier BB6 guns on thier CV6's? i dought it. how you gona balance thats thats just bs.
P-51's never were cv based to begine with thier air frames were not built for rugged landing's they would have riped in half on the flight deck.
on the other hand the KM cv line is entirely speculatory, wheres my ME-262's?
I wana dog them for years.
there is no game balance here at all!

usa gets ftrs that can chase down my T-5 scouts but i cant catch anones
they have twice the fuel if the speed wasent enough
and to top that off they get best offence/deffence :(
where the heck is the balance here?

can we leave jets out. There was no way jets were able to land on ww2 carriers with the aviable technology of the early 1940's