+1

I couldn't express it better.

I could add you can't enter a room without 0.2 belt then.

In last years flexibility of the setups for ships has been decreased.

BB6s have unchangeable guns and armored setups have been removed.

SSs also have unchangeable guns, you even can't delete them.

Also, along the years most of the BBs have only 1 real option for guns. Only one option is a bit sad.

And now suggesting things like this for CVs ... well, I don't see positive to keep decreasing the flexibility of the ships setups for forcing noob players to have a proper setup. Even with proper setups a retarded player will still be a retarded player and you are limiting players that are not playing bad.

 

Example:

I have a CV3 with 2 reps + 1 eng +4fps + 1 db.

I load 1st wave 4+4 fps, kill some scouts and scout enemy if needed.

I load 2nd wave 4+4 fps and do the same.

I want to load 8 dbs in 3rd wave for see if i chase something. And since i have 5 slots for pilots i preffer to have 4fps +1 db than 3fps +2 dbs. I have 16 fps on the air and consuming time for load the full wave of dbs in that moment will not be bad for my team. If my 16 fps die i always can pulse the cancel button and make another 4+4 fps wave.

I'm not playing bad, i'm playing for the team and i know perfectly what i'm doing. Why you have to force me to eliminate my engy and force me to carry a 2nd db when  i like to have a engy on the cv? Why?

 

Of course it bothers me to see a cv5 loading 10 tbs in one squad and waste them on a DD. But even when suggestions look like a great idea and you think "oh, looks great, let's do it" you should try to think a bit more and see the consecuences.

 

 

Give me one benefit to loading 7 or more planes on one pilot.

As long as exp is shared, then you should be restricted to setups that aren't stupid and actions that aren't stupid. Restrictions are there in a game for a reason. 

Can you give me one benefit of forcing that player to stop at 6 planes and not beeing able to load anything after that cause all other pilots are already in the sky?

You still haven't answered of WHO is the one that determines WHICH setups are allowed and which not!
This is a game! It should make fun! Reducing options is fun cutting IMO.

And to all those that think "stupid" setups is a kind of leeching or weakens team some thoughts from me:
1. Most likely there is not only one "stupid" setup in a room. Having 2 teams means there is a chance that "stupid" setups splits equally.
2. I've seen people failing with "weired" setups  often. I've also seen people failing with setups you prouve to be acceptable even more often.
3. I've also seen people with weired setups doing good stuff. Why forcing them to use normal setups when they can't handle it? Yes, weired setups need soemtimes time to get used to - and sometimes only to recognize that they do not work for the player.
4. There are some weired setups out there that are somewhat "accepted". I just like to remind that it were players that had options in the game that found those setups. We still get introduced new (unbalanced) stuff in this game. Sometimes, someone has to try something out to react on those changes out there. Most won't work, some do.

After all: Those who NEVER have used a BB without scout (or not full crew of supporter) for leveling other stuff, or never had anything else on their CV than pilots and seamen and maybe gunners (whats the use of that setup?) may throw the first stone.

And so I'm throwing my stone first. Don't be silly, not all of us are selfish and arrogant.

Regarding 1)... Ohhhh, so there is retards on both sides, that makes everything fair then.

Which points out the entire flaw in your logic.

Those retards on BOTH sides are ruining the game for the REST of the people. 

More murders doesn't suddenly make murder justified.