ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

General Discussion

  Index

  • GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 01:32


Nmac

Despite what the rest of the NF community thinks of Taranto it was a good battle KT, I think I can say that everybody that turned up had a really good battle in the end, so well done it was a good game.

Nmac 

 

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 08:05


GoodAim

Originally Posted by Rehor

Another non-sly and weak chop from Nmac.

It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.

Now if you can just exercise that intellect a bit more, you can see the problem.  No, wait, you probably can't.



Another troll from Rehor.

It is done already boring, change job dude.

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 11:20


Rehor

Originally Posted by GoodAim

Originally Posted by Rehor

Another non-sly and weak chop from Nmac.

It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.

Now if you can just exercise that intellect a bit more, you can see the problem.  No, wait, you probably can't.



Another troll from Rehor.

It is done already boring, change job dude.



Responding to what was said =/= troll.

Few things make me happier than "your types" proving your own selves wrong.

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 11:30


ljsevern

Originally Posted by GoodAim

Originally Posted by Rehor

Another non-sly and weak chop from Nmac.

It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.

Now if you can just exercise that intellect a bit more, you can see the problem.  No, wait, you probably can't.



Another troll from Rehor.

It is done already boring, change job dude.



So when people post something you don't like, its automatically a troll?

Why don't you discuss why you think he's incorrect and why you think Taranto is a relevant harbour?

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 11:56


Adefesios
GG KT!

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 13:23


flaggelant

Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by GoodAim

Originally Posted by Rehor

Another non-sly and weak chop from Nmac.

It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.

Now if you can just exercise that intellect a bit more, you can see the problem.  No, wait, you probably can't.



Another troll from Rehor.

It is done already boring, change job dude.



So when people post something you don't like, its automatically a troll?

Why don't you discuss why you think he's incorrect and why you think Taranto is a relevant harbour?



[QUOTE]It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.[/QUOTE]

no official statements were made about any levels, so it's an assumption at best.

and if the remark on intellect doesnt do the rest to make it a troll post i'd say you have a special view on what trolling means.


As to the relevance of Taranto;
what makes a harbour relevant?
free repair? rentals? HT location on the map? timeslot?

The only thing that makes a harbour relevant is how many fleets are willing to fight over it, and since there have been several HA's Taranto in means it's relevant.
(Besides all that, the relevance of a harbour has nothing to do with a GG topic)

All this coming from you Lj from jedi has me wondering why you even bother to reply to a HA topic (was it not in one of rehors HA related reviews that he pointed to Jedi to: "Shit or get of the pot" ?) because if i measure relevance by participation i dont think there's much for you to claim here. (dunno about your merc history, and frankly i dont care)




for a long time people have been complaining about small or less skilled fleets not participating in HA's and now that some of them are actually picking up on HA's again every single topic about it is dragged into the mud.

reading the same idiotic "i'm better than you, make sure you remember that" posts all the time gets really old really quick.

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 13:47


Rehor

[QUOTE=flaggelant]

Originally Posted by ljsevern

Originally Posted by GoodAim

Originally Posted by Rehor

Another non-sly and weak chop from Nmac.

It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.

Now if you can just exercise that intellect a bit more, you can see the problem.  No, wait, you probably can't.



Another troll from Rehor.

It is done already boring, change job dude.



So when people post something you don't like, its automatically a troll?

Why don't you discuss why you think he's incorrect and why you think Taranto is a relevant harbour?



[QUOTE]It is good to know - now officially - that AA and KT both think on a different level than the rest of us.[/QUOTE]

no official statements were made about any levels, so it's an assumption at best.

and if the remark on intellect doesnt do the rest to make it a troll post i'd say you have a special view on what trolling means.


As to the relevance of Taranto;
what makes a harbour relevant?
free repair? rentals? HT location on the map? timeslot?

The only thing that makes a harbour relevant is how many fleets are willing to fight over it, and since there have been several HA's Taranto in means it's relevant.
(Besides all that, the relevance of a harbour has nothing to do with a GG topic)

All this coming from you Lj from jedi has me wondering why you even bother to reply to a HA topic (was it not in one of rehors HA related reviews that he pointed to Jedi to: "Shit or get of the pot" ?) because if i measure relevance by participation i dont think there's much for you to claim here. (dunno about your merc history, and frankly i dont care)




for a long time people have been complaining about small or less skilled fleets not participating in HA's and now that some of them are actually picking up on HA's again every single topic about it is dragged into the mud.

reading the same idiotic "i'm better than you, make sure you remember that" posts all the time gets really old really quick.

[/QUOTE]

Unsurprisingly, right straight over your head too.

Boy I wish I had the time to pick apart what you wrote because it is GOLD.

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 13:58


flaggelant

Originally Posted by flaggelant

reading the same idiotic "i'm better than you, make sure you remember that" posts all the time gets really old really quick.

 



i know very well what you meant, i just explained to Lj why it's trolling and not just your opinion

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 14:16


ljsevern

Originally Posted by flaggelant

no official statements were made about any levels, so it's an assumption at best.



Well, the OP did say "Despite what the rest of the community thinks of Taranto". Pretty sure thats as official as anything.

Originally Posted by flaggelant

and if the remark on intellect doesnt do the rest to make it a troll post i'd say you have a special view on what trolling means.


Where did I make a post about intellect? Or are you referring to someone else?

Originally Posted by flaggelant

As to the relevance of Taranto;
what makes a harbour relevant?
free repair? rentals? HT location on the map? timeslot?

The only thing that makes a harbour relevant is how many fleets are willing to fight over it, and since there have been several HA's Taranto in means it's relevant.
(Besides all that, the relevance of a harbour has nothing to do with a GG topic)


I never said it wasn't relevant. I asked for what the persons opinion was, as he was responding to the claim that it wasn't relevent. Let me ask you this; Why doesn't your fleet hold it?


Originally Posted by flaggelant

All this coming from you Lj from jedi has me wondering why you even bother to reply to a HA topic (was it not in one of rehors HA related reviews that he pointed to Jedi to: "Shit or get of the pot" ?) because if i measure relevance by participation i dont think there's much for you to claim here. (dunno about your merc history, and frankly i dont care)


What does my current participation in HA have to do with anything? I asked a question and I asked for a constructive discussion. As you clearly so desperately want to know; Jedi aren't currently active in HA due to lack of numbers due to the current game climate (Desyncs/Crashes). Maybe that will change, maybe not. But i've experienced HA for a long time and participated in many fleet leagues. I personally am not mercing right now.

Originally Posted by flaggelant

for a long time people have been complaining about small or less skilled fleets not participating in HA's and now that some of them are actually picking up on HA's again every single topic about it is dragged into the mud.

reading the same idiotic "i'm better than you, make sure you remember that" posts all the time gets really old really quick.



Where have I said that in this topic? I asked for someone's reasoning.

Oh, and tell my fan club I said hi.

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 14:44


Rehor

Originally Posted by flaggelant
i know very well what you meant


Wait, who has the high opinion of self here?

  • Re : GG KT

    03. 01. 2015 15:04


jacopo

Originally Posted by flaggelant

As to the relevance of Taranto;

what makes a harbour relevant?
free repair? rentals? HT location on the map? timeslot?

The answer is contained in this quote...

2 slightly less than average fleets fighting over a harbor nobody gives a damned about is like deciding which menu item at Mcdonalds is healthier for you.

Look at the bright side, at least neither of you is Lead Coalition...

1 2 3 4 5 6