this is simple

fw no exp --->bw--->your scout got aaed-->low attack--->low exp--->ask cv scout--->no one scout for you


Gb2 have a great team work in it

fw cv can have lots exp too
and fw will know they gotta scout
wont be lower than bw at least

and aa ships + fc cv

why dont let both game style work well together

Im really not noticing that big a difference. My highs may be lower in my CV (Ark Royal) but my lows arent as frequent or as low, plus the game turnover rate is faster than it was before, so more games which is better for xp.

in my usn cv4 i did get a expert increase item drop but the exp gain doesn't seem different and i get the same exp as i usually get.

If you scout all game and your team has their thump up their ass all game in which you lose. I only make about 13-17k exp per lose. In wins I make about 40k exp at best. In GBIIs however I can make 50k-60k exp.

I drive a US PCV with a BO that is at least 110.

not just cv's xp is lowered but my bb xp is crap too,
159k attack took few dammages had a huge win and 35k xp, gbs that would be 50kish (no prem btw)

Also playing IJN pcv, 49k attack w/ bombers and 10k personal credits + win= 28k xp, rly????????????? Is SDE just trying to screw us over?

20k xp in gold account on ark royal as a win.
Though it was a fail game, that ammount of xp is quite high.

wha wha wha nxt topic

they nerfed gb2 exp when they dropped it from 20/8 to 16/6 while there is less lag/crossing, and feels more tactical. For the same attack i used to get much more exp in gb2 like it was then gb1 is now.

20/8, prepatch gb2 is FTW.

spanks out gb1 now and new gb2.

if i had it my way I would want 20/8 exp in 16/6 gb2 room.

TY NF for junking exp