Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Imperial Japanese Navy

  Index

  • CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 06. 2010 08:36

Exthileon4
So Right now I have 2 B.Os, 1 is in Kongo and 1 is in Ryujo. Im planning on lvling one
of them to 120 first be which 1 should it be? For the people who say just lvl both I
shall say no. I want to do 1 fully then do the next.
Amagi= Decent BB6, But Shells are in the air FOREVER. Great AA.
De Grasse= Looks nice xD, alot to pay for repair, most plane space, Fits guns for
close combat, Costy like Amagi.
Keep giving me the Pros and Cons for these 2 ships pls and tell me in your opinion
which would be best to lvl first. And I will be using prem(50% chance) or not.
  Index

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 19:26

angus725


That would be my second account, if you want proof it's mine, then go check the HoF.

Want to post yours now?

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 15:22

aide4
+ that sounds like a very real scenario no matter how hard the cv tries it cant cover
every inch of the sea around the bb6 100% of the time

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 15:01

aide4
XD ive seen it happen some of the bb6 drivers on iowa are terrible a at lvl revenge could
kill them easily

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 11:47

Krauts08
lol contradictory statements ftw..

This sounds like a school yard argument.

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 11:26

Exthileon4
'Lets put it this way.'

Angus:"Team 1 has a good BB6 player, and a bad CV player.

Team 2 has a 38% winrate BB6 player, and a very good CV player.

The 38% winrate BB player decided that he shall rush north, and get sunk by a BB2
on the process of rushing a CV north.
All the while that's happening, the good BB6 player goes south, flanks a few BB4s
and 5s from the south. North rolls over team 2, and flanks team 1's north.

See my point? Also, if you can make the difference in a game with a CV, I expect
your stats be somewhat like this. (well, at least 52% win, and 1 BB sunk per 3
games)



If you were as good as you say, why don't you post your main acccount's stats?''
Seriosly dude? You think a BB would rush a BB2 and get sunk? The odds of that are
LOW. Even you know the odds are low for that scenario. But the Bad BB6 with the
Good CV and the Bad CV with the Good BB6 can happen. The Smart CV btw would
make sure the targets blind at all times. Don't be stupid. You'd know wht the smart
CV would do to make sure the BB6 doesn't get sunk.
A pathetic scenario. Get real Angus. A BB6 does not get owned by a BB2 like that
unless their blind, then maybe they'll get sunk. I've seen BB6s alot of times in
battles. The good ones, and the ones that are called noobs. If this is how your
scenarios work that means your stupid. If you atleast make the scenario more
detailed then maybe I'd believe you.
I don't really have a main account. I usually use my secondary accounts. Well I do
have a main but, I forgot about it.

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 09:23

angus725
Lets put it this way.

Team 1 has a good BB6 player, and a bad CV player.

Team 2 has a 38% winrate BB6 player, and a very good CV player.

The 38% winrate BB player decided that he shall rush north, and get sunk by a BB2
on the process of rushing a CV north.
All the while that's happening, the good BB6 player goes south, flanks a few BB4s
and 5s from the south. North rolls over team 2, and flanks team 1's north.

See my point? Also, if you can make the difference in a game with a CV, I expect
your stats be somewhat like this. (well, at least 52% win, and 1 BB sunk per 3
games)



If you were as good as you say, why don't you post your main acccount's stats?

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 24. 2010 07:52

Exthileon4
HAHAHA!!!! Angus I've had alot of experiences with people in H44s or SYs who have
extensive training and are very elite in using AA. I haven't seen your AAing skills yet.
So Angus what your saying is true you I respect when you say your a Good at AAing.
I know CV in alot of ways. I got lots of tactics to hit you with every single plane that
I put out there. The point is, We'll never actually know What happens untill you try
me. CV6 mostly> BB6. But it truly depends on your skill.
And what you said about it's not the CVs Fault. It is 75% of the time. If your lower
than a CV3 Everyone understands that you might not be skilled to give them cover.
But, The CV is always going to be the one who decides the Winner or The Loser.
Well, most of the time. If you don't know how important your CV is to you, you'll find
it out the hard way.

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 23. 2010 18:59

GordonRamsay
Angus pretty much wrote the book on modern IJN driving.....along with Boom

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 23. 2010 18:47

gunsword
If you call yourself an elite pro...you most likely aren't one.

  • Re : CV6 V.s BB6

    05. 23. 2010 09:10

angus725
I'd rather have a good lead BB player in my team than a CV. I don't care if my CV
sucks a bit, as long as I don't make the mistake first on the battle line, we'll be able
to kill a BB once in a while. (or hell, fictoy L2 style or something)

As far as the taiho thing, 3 TB/DB runs isnt exactly good for your team...Go ahead
and try that in a HA or FL, and I'll agree that's valid. Also, if I was in an amagi or
Kaiser, I'd shoot down a good propotion of your bombers as well.

As far as my experience goes, I knew how many and how fast fighters are loaded
and the limits are. I understand that pure fighter cover is bad for XP, and I also
know that if your team is blind, it isn't always the CVs fault.

Sounds like you're going IJN CV first?
1 2 3 4 5