The African Alliance are also looking at implementing a 'no fly zone'.
The US do not NEED to do anything, but they WILL stick their nose in, just as cameron here
is doing trying to threaen a 'no fly zone' when hes decommisioned our aircraft carriers, GG !!

"Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark."
"Democracy means permanent rule."
"A woman has a right to run for election whether she's male or female."

Hard to compete with a guy who has this reasoning on his side....



Half a page before the "I hate the US/Obama is an idiot/I think I know politics because I
took a poly-sci class" posters show up. That may be a new record. Quite a bit of the
response has been dictated by NATO, and if anything, you should be bashing the American
media for romanticizing the fact that hundreds of people are dying.

There are certain parts of the world where peace would never be possible.
Let's just leave them to do whatever they want to each other.

zieht dem Fratz das Fell ?er die Ohren.

EXECUTION

This wouldn't have happened if Libya stayed under British/French control. Much like the rest of the world.

United States doesn't need to do anything.

The funny thing is that the US's support of that nation will actually be it's downfall.
Can't go into specifics but it's pretty much our fault for supporting them.

There's a certain country around there that if threatened, the US backs it up 120%.
That's where almost all middle east intervention starts from. To sum it up, the US has
it's balls in someone else's pocket.

No, I'm not going to mention it's name but, it all started happening right after WWII.

No matter what happens in Libya or in any other part of the world, regardless whether
the US gets involved or not, it will be blamed on the US. So it doesn't really matter what
Obama does.

id say since US is the international policeman, he should intervene (muck like the UK in a
century ago)

well, that's just me