Yeah it doesn't really seem that the average range is different. What is noticable to me was the difference in shell damage. That does seem broken. Most that I have seen at max angle only doing just over 4k to unarmored targets. It seems that it is outgunned by my regular Yammy. Could just be me though. After looking further it seems that my average damage per shell hit is about 4400. Is this correct for these guns now?

I regret calling them trolls, but I do not deserve to be treated like a child. All I would like is a simple explanation as to why I am wrong. That is how you learn from mistakes. You cannot learn from a mistake if you do not know what it is.  I would very much like to increase my knowledge.  This is why I would like a proper explanation. If it is something that cannot be said public fine say that and message me. This is all I ask.

hmm simple solution

gather 7 BB6 and test the range damage make a video

TODAYs BS vs ALL  first battle and i think theres no change at all in the range but a bit low on the shell damage 

I was the author of the change for the kaiser.

Change: better spread, less max damage, and better consistency.

Which means at the end of the day, no matter how you suck or rule, you will still get better damage, because your damage does not do weird 20k when you blast a full ammo on BB5/BB6

... Isn't the range indicator in the harbor always broken?

I mean, I have to apply a -50 modifier on every USN BB when adjusting guideline length to make it even resemble the real range.