Well stalingrad is a bit OPed. Just had a fleet intern bb4 tournament and it clearly showed that its a tiny bit better then H39 in a 3vs3. Please notice it got 2nd smallest hitbox, only RM bb4 is smaller and with 39-40knots there isnt really a speed disadvantage.

About RM bb4: range is clearly hugely affected by its spread.... With at lvl gunners shells tend to land at Lion1 range, but when they get 98+ the range rises and becomes Iowa like but still has lots of range jumps causing to range a h44 occasionally.

RM bb5 is in 1 word underpowered. it hits less then H44. (H44 does 43-44k (inconsisty not taken into account, while RM bb5 does 41-42k but more consistently). Furthermore its spread makes it really hard to land a good salvo, at least at lvl (i have just reached lvl 106). If i remember correctly it was easyer to land a good salvo with H44 then with RM bb5. About its range its SY like but agains bad spread causes sometimes some shells to fly further.

Thread has been cleaned.

Stalingrad a bit overpowered? Only a bit? It's practically an Iowa with H39 range and more with yamato damage.

Sry, but H44 does not hit harder in whatsoever than the rm BB5.

You are comparing apple and orange. You compare H44 non inconsistency vs RM BB5 inconsistency.

You wanted and insist a super low angle gun, there you have it. Don't complain about the problem.

Where did you get those pro's and con's from?

We all know RM is out of whack. SN needs some tweaking.

KM has the longest range in each tier. The only time it comes near is the SN BB4, which obviously needs a bit of tweaking. 

Cleaned some more of the thread.

If it turns into personal attacks again, the thread will get locked.

LJ, I believe those are copied of nf-guides.com , which is incrediably outdated.