Regarding engagement favoured towards ships with a max OH speed; That is completely incorrect. Range is far more important.

These ships are large. As you go up the tiers, ships get slower and turn slower. That is a trait the game has.

QV; Its almost as if it has poor range, poor damage and that repair is capped and other nations (other than maybe IJN) can reach it. If you honestly thing QV is going to slaughter everyone in HA, I suggest getting a P24 or an Amagi and laughing at the QV armour. 

Why is possible to have different fire power, guns, range, speed or armor and all the same turning force?

CONCEPT thats the beginning of every engineering project

Modern pocket BB should have more turning force than BB6 or EBB6 but and old 1914 ship maybe not.

Sorry, I am disagree, speed and turn abilities depend of design not only how large is the ship, even in real life or this game.

For example, in our game many BBs lower tier have less speed than highers.

The shape, engines (and aditional engines or helix), displacement, etc.  are very important at this point.

Why is possible to have different fire power, guns, range, speed or armor and all the same turning force?

CONCEPT thats the beginning of every engineering project, you can do whatever you want (see our poor Hood), just cannot be the best in all, maybe less speed or less displacement give extra turning force, like more damaged per salvo means worse reload. Or less fire power (without higher range) -> less weight -> +turning force or speed

Modern pocket BB should have more turning force than BB6 or EBB6 but and old 1914 ship maybe not.

Guys what about Gulio Cesare, y the nerf, u killed that amazing ship which was a very common used eBB cause of those guns and speed, now no one will use it and even if will have a massive problem which guns to use. There are 4 possibilities, even the AD's guns could be used there???

Y the turning nerf for pBBs? For me this patch was unnecessery and dont even think about to nerf the Shinano ...

¿Test team or development team (game owners)? Please start calling things correctly.

For me this patch is disrespectful to our community

BB6

I don´t know if this changes will improve the game or not, but I cannot understand why 9+2 guys should change completly the game.

Players spent time, money and effort to research one particular nation, prepare crews specifically (+-engies, Tgunners or not, +- reload/acc, etc) for a Charlemagne, Amagi or whatever with have its own special caracteristics, now you change this ships and maybe all this effort has no sense for many player.

Test team for me means, people who works to fix errors, issues and improve slightly few details.

Next time you want change completly one ship, please, change also the ship name.

It is not about it will be better or worse, the fact is that you changed OUR ships.

EBB6

With new ships do whatever you want (as Development Team), but again, please, do it well. First define (and even better if explain) a concept (maybe asking in the forum), develop all looking at this concept, finish the work, test and when everything is ok, give people chance to purchase it, no more changes at least not big ones.

If you are not sure about new EBBs maybe SDE could give them for free few weeks, all players play, more feedbacks, last changes, all this free ships dissapear from accounts and then players could purchase final version, knowing exactly what they are buying.


I don´t want to attack at Development Team, I know most of them do their best but I think it cannot be the right way to improve the game and promote loyalty between players and this game.

Best regards