Community - Forum - View old data

Categories :  

Off-Topic

  Index

  • 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 05:40

Nubbles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zumwalt_class_destroyer

Uss_Zumwalt.jpg>

That, without doubt, is the ugliest DD...ever. I honestly don't care about it's stealth ability,
or its advanced FCS. The enemy will run away when they see one of those...because of its
ugliness rather than its lethality.

What was wrong with coventional DD designs?
  Index

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 07. 2011 14:22

f0xd1e
I was going to post something about the US Navys new plan for the DD(X)
destroyers....however it appears it was renamed to zumwalt..... fail

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 07. 2011 14:07

Nubbles
"and france FF
where you see ugly in Picasso job?"

That looks like a FF01, lol. Looks horrible as well.


"if you read further into this... you will learn that the navy cancelled this design in
favor of building dozens more Arleigh Burke class DDG's"

They only cancelled the part that keeps it balanced, as far as I can work out. The main body
retains, but the bottom bit is changed to the one Emma posted.

Oh, and to all you Arleigh Burke supporters, respect. It's a superb DDG, and really is the
representation of real 21 century ships. I was reading something about it the other day, and
it had 70km range (the Iowa only has 40km). Amazing how technology has gotten 60 years
later.

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 07. 2011 08:03

fokker
Why would you consider it to have limited capabilities?

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 07. 2011 05:10

leaderwolf
Actually have just a displacement of DD,a bombastic named(DD) for the limited capabilities.

Greats of swidish sexy corvete:

and france FF

where you see ugly in Picasso job?

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 21:13

fokker
Last I heard the Zumwalt class was reduced in number to 3 but not totally canceled

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 19:39

Halcion
It is pretty ugly. But its first generation, give it some time to get refined. Not that
aesthetics matter in combat anyway.

I'm sure we'll see more like the Zumwalts when there's a need for a stealth
destroyer. I think it was a good decision to build more Arleigh Burke's, they're good
value for the money.

When the Chinese start thinking and building a blue ocean navy there will be more
call for such expensive warships. They'll have to redesign future stealth ships to
incorporate a realistic rail gun armament anyway. Its on the horizon.

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 13:32

Alex77
i bet that the community of the 1930s and 40s thought that the ships we play with
in NF looked unconventional and ugly. its only the next step in naval evolution.

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 11:44

LILITALY5179
if you read further into this... you will learn that the navy cancelled this design in
favor of building dozens more Arleigh Burke class DDG's

  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 11:14

RedHerrINGS






  • Re : 21 Century DD=Ugly

    02. 06. 2011 10:25

TimmyC
Don't worry - they're only building 3 of them.
1 2 3 4