ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Suggestions

  Index

  • Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    02. 09. 2012 22:01

Recommend : 13

angus725


Due to the following quote, I'm creating a thread to keep track of new ship suggestions. I'll be hiding posts as I add them to the main post to keep it easy to read.

I will only add to the main list that have link(s) with gun sizes and stats and a picture.


Issue 4:
 Ship Design Competition – Ljsevern, Fleet Leader Forum, 2 Feb:

Could we hold a ship design competition of some form and then implement it?

Answer 4: This is a very good idea. As luck would have it, we recently hired an NF graphic designer who would be able to help pick out some good ship images from the player side. We will work on setting this into motion for use in the near future.

 
USN:

BB:

USS Michigan BB-27 - [South Carlina Class - 1910] 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Michigan_(BB-27) 

South Carolina Class BB (1908)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Carolina_class_battleship 


CV:
SS:
Others:

UK:

BB:

HMS Agincourt
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Agincourt_(1913)

HMS Lion (1910)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Lion_(1910) 

Royal Sovereign Class (1889)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Sovereign_class_battleship  

CV:

HMS Eagle
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Eagle_%281918%29 

HMS Furious
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Furious_%2847%29 

SS:
Others:

KM:

BB:

L20 class
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L_20_%CE%B1_class_battleship

 H41 - H43 Class 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H_class_battleship_proposals 

Bayern Class (1913)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayern_class_battleship 


CV:
SS:
Others:

IJN:

BB:

Number 13 (As a BB4)(Would go 42 knots)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_13_class_battleship

Tosa/Kaga Class BB (As a BB3, would be the a side line, would be succeeded by Number 13 in line then lead to SY)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tosa_class_battleship 

Kii Class BB
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kii_class_battleship 
Amagi Class BC
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amagi_class_battlecruiser 

CV:

Hiyo CV
https://www.wesworld.jk-clan.de/thread.php?postid=8644 

Shinyo CV
https://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_cv_shinyo.htm 

Chitose CV
https://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_cv_chitose.htm 

Ibuki CV
https://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_cv_ibuki.htm 

Akitsu Maru
https://www.navypedia.org/ships/japan/jap_aux_akitsu_maru.htm 

SS:


Others:

MN:

BB:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_battleship_Henri_IV
Henri IV (either as CA or BB) 
CV:
SS:
Others:

SN:

BB:

Bubnov designs, Putilov designs, "1914 ultimate battleship study", V.P. Kostenko's 1917 Black Sea Battleship:
https://www.gwpda.org/naval/irn16bb.htm 
(I believe the Quad 16" for the Sovietsky and the trip 16" for the Stalingrad are from these designs)

Tsesarevich
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_battleship_Tsesarevich  

Peresvet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peresviet_class_battleship  

Potemkin

 

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    06. 26. 2012 21:21


Baker654

For my Dream ships I would like them to be the new Premium Battleships for UK, US and KM as their current PBB (Sevestapol_US, Andrea Doria_KM and Dunkerque_UK) are now redudant with the release of the French, Soviets and Italians.

UK:

G3 Battlecruiser

Durability: 22 800

Normal Displacement: 49,200 t

Maximum displacement: 54,774 t

Length: 260.9 m

Beam: 32.3 m

R-slot Armament: three 3x16"/45 Mark I

Advantages: Very durable, Powerful 16 inch guns, Fast for it size,

Disadvantages: Huge (Hood size huge), limited firing arc for rear turret, Blind spot on the rear of the ship, guns are relatively short ranged

 

US:

USS Arkansas BB-33 (Wyoming class)

Durability: 20 000

Normal Displacement: 26,000 t

Max Displacement: 27,680 t)

Length: 171 m

Beam: 28.4 m

R-slot Armament: six 2x12"/50 mark 7 guns

Advantages: has a total of 12 guns, relatively small

Disadvantes: gun would do light damage, slow

 

USS Saratoga CC-03 (Lexington class Battlecruiser) the picture does not belong to me

Durability: 20 400

Normal Displacement: 44,200 t

Max Displacement: 45,354 t

Length: 266.4 m

Beam: 32.1 m

R-slot Armament: four 2x16"/50 Mark 2

T slots: 10 x 80

Advantages: has 10 T-slots (5 on each side) that can fire a wide varitiy of Dual purpose guns, very fast

Disadvantges: Very big, not as durable as the G3

 

KM:

Mackensens

Durability: 21 400

Normal Displacement: 31,000 t

Max Displacement: 35,300 t

Length: 223 meters

Beam: 30.4 meters

R slot armament: Four 2x13.8" SK L/45

Advantages: Very Durable, long ranged guns

Disadvantes: Large size (not as large as the G3 and Saratoga),

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    07. 17. 2012 12:37


Rommisfd

for USN CV:
USS Gambier Bay CVE-73 (cv2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Gambier_Bay

USS Ranger CV-4 (cv2)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ranger_(CV-4)

USS Langely CV-1 (cv 3)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Langley_(CV-1)

USS Forrestal CV-59 (cv 7)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forrestal_class_aircraft_carrier

USS Kitty Hawk CV-63 (cv8)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitty_Hawk_class_aircraft_carrier

USS Enterprise CVN-65 (cv9)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enterprise_class_aircraft_carrier

USS Nimitz CVN-68 (cv10)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nimitz_class_aircraft_carrier

USS Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 (cv11)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_R._Ford_class_aircraft_carrier

also to go with these new ships i ask if there can be jet aircraft eg:
fighters: F1J-Fury, F9F Panther, F8F Bearcat(prop-driven plane ),F8 Crusader, and finally the F-4 Phantom for jet fighters.
bombers: A-1 Skyraider, A6 Intruder, A7 corsair II,  and A12 Avenger II
torp bomber: AF Gaurdian, andS-2 Tracker.

all of these can be researched on wikipedia.org
thank you for your time. 
 
images images,images,images,images,images,images,images these are the links for the ship pictures they are in order as listed above
images,images,images,f8carrierl.jpg,images,images,images,images, not found,grumman_AF_guardian_02.jpg,images these are images of the planes listed above in the order of the list

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    07. 23. 2012 22:35


STOGDOG1

i would hope that somewhere in here SDE would find a way to change the CV6s so EACH nation had its OWN CV6. its irritating having 2 Degrasses and 2 Midways when every other ship is at least NAMED differently to show which nation its part of. even just doing what they did with the premium ships and naming them UK_Midway and US_Midway would be some improvement.

just my 2 cents

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    07. 23. 2012 22:51


Baker654

Originally Posted by STOGDOG1

i would hope that somewhere in here SDE would find a way to change the CV6s so EACH nation had its OWN CV6. its irritating having 2 Degrasses and 2 Midways when every other ship is at least NAMED differently to show which nation its part of. even just doing what they did with the premium ships and naming them UK_Midway and US_Midway would be some improvement.

just my 2 cents


But it is preferable if UK gets its own unquie designs such as the UK getting Habakkuk for the CV6

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    08. 16. 2012 19:04


Stealth001

I agree with you guys about the BBs CVs and most of the ships you mentioned, but i cant realy believe that you are missing tons of important WWI and WWII KM U-boats (SS).
In a personal opinion it would be great if you add some of the next mentioned SS tipes for KM (if some of them are actualy placed in the game doesnt realy affect the list) :

Tipe I

Tipe II "A" / II "B"

Tipe VII "A" / VII "B" / VII "C" / VII "C/41" 

Tipe IX "A" / "B" / "C" / "D"
 
Tipe X

Tipe XIV

Tipe XXI

Tipe XXIII


If you are going to add new shiplines in the game, this is a good choise to make. 

P.S: You can tell me the KM SS fan, but i think most of you wount reject this idea.

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    08. 25. 2012 20:51


Baker654

Originally Posted by Stealth001

I agree with you guys about the BBs CVs and most of the ships you mentioned, but i cant realy believe that you are missing tons of important WWI and WWII KM U-boats (SS).
In a personal opinion it would be great if you add some of the next mentioned SS tipes for KM (if some of them are actualy placed in the game doesnt realy affect the list) :

Tipe I

Tipe II "A" / II "B"

Tipe VII "A" / VII "B" / VII "C" / VII "C/41" 

Tipe IX "A" / "B" / "C" / "D"
 
Tipe X

Tipe XIV

Tipe XXI

Tipe XXIII


If you are going to add new shiplines in the game, this is a good choise to make. 

P.S: You can tell me the KM SS fan, but i think most of you wount reject this idea.

I aprove of the Type XXI infact I think it should be the KM SS6. I think I should add the Type XI as the KM PSS. its main armament would have been four 127 mm guns, in two twin gun turrets and 6 torpedo tubes (4 in the bow and two at the stern, all below the CWL). Had the Type XI U-boat been constructed, it would have been by far the largest of the U-boats and the second-largest diesel submarine after the Japanese I-400-class submarine.

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    08. 27. 2012 15:40


Baker654

Originally Posted by Quenirland

My WW2 Dream Ship is the Japanese Mini-Sub.

 

I originally thought that they were 1-Man Submarines; but, a recent TV Documentary about one being discovered in a Hawaiian Harbor claimed they were 2-Man Subs.

 

Sure they only have 2 Torpedoes for attacking; which, makes them very undesirable for the NAVY FIELD Battles; but, I would still like to see them as playable Warships.

 

Maybe the Japanese Mini-Sub could serve as the SS0 that I had mentioned in my "SS1 Torped Fire Issues" General Discussion Topic Thread.

 

NAVY FIELD SHIP DATA

NAME:  (needs researching)

LEVEL: 

GUN:  0

TORPEDO:  2

CREDIT:  (needs researching)

MINIMUM TONNAGE:  (needs researching)

MAXIMUM TONNAGE:  (needs researching)

TURN:  (needs researching)

STRUCTURE:  (needs researching)

AAW:  0

OVERHEATING:  (needs researching)

FCS:  (needs researching)

ENGINE:  (needs researching)

AIRCRAFT:  0 Planes / 0 Tonnage

AMMO:  2 Torpedoes (maximum)

 

The Japanese mini subs. At one time I suggested 3 special project japanese submarines as alternatives for SS6. The choices were the I-201 (a japanese version of the german Type XXI), I-400 (A carrier submarine pretty much a larger version of the current IJN SS5) and the Type C mother submarine which takes the concept of the carrier sub, but launchs Midget Submarines such as the Type A Ko-hyoteki underwater. Treat the Midget submarines as submergable torpedo bomber that are stealther than normal submarines but have shorter air time and can fire only 2 torpedos and have only 200 DP

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    08. 29. 2012 05:21


Eldelbarrio2
USN: BB: USS Oklahoma (BB-37) [As a possible re-model for USS Nevada] USS California (BB-44) [As a possible re-model for USS Tennessee] CL: USS Fargo (CL-106) USS Huntington (CL-107) [As a possible re-model for USS Fargo] Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Oklahoma_(BB-37) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_California_(BB-44) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Huntington_(CL-107) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Fargo_(CL-106)

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    08. 31. 2012 06:26


tipsypo

I would like to see more "small ships" being added such as Destroyers and Light Cruisers and even Heavy Cruisers. Has not really been any new ones since the game started (except the PCL and PCA). Also those captains that use the small ships are providing your AAW and ASW so why not reward them (yes I am one lol) with some new ships. With the Royal Navy alone there are the following classes that could be added whom served within the Second World War, linked to the wikipedia entry;

DESTROYERS
A Class
B Class
C and D Class
E and F Class
G and H Class
I Class
J, K and N Class*
S and T Class
U and V Class
W and Z Class
C Class

LIGHT CRUISERS
Caledon Subclass of C Class
Ceres Subclass of C Class
Carlisle Subclass of C Class
Danae Class
Leander Class
Arethusa Class
Southampton Subclass of Town Class (as our current Edinburgh is the Edinburgh Subclass of Town Class)
Gloucester Subclass of Town Class (as our current Edinburgh is the Edinburgh Subclass of Town Class)
Crown Colony Class*

HEAVY CRUISERS
Hawkins Class Cruiser
London Subclass of County Class* (as reckon current County is a Kent Subclass)
Norfolk Subclass of Cunty Class (as reckon current County is a Kent Subclass)

I have put an asterisk alongside those I would personally like to see. Also I don't think these need to be uber'd up to make them any better than existing destroyers and cruisers in the game, would just want more to choose than the four destroyers, five light cruisers and four heavy cruisers that are available to the Royal Navy, when there are what sixteen battleships/battlecruisers and nine carriers to choose from.

  • Re : Dream-ships (suggestion compilation)

    10. 15. 2012 20:23


Billme

sorry i did not read this whole thread so forgive me if it already in here.

 

I would love to see the USS. ALABAMA in this.

 

it was the King of the pacific.

it was never sunk.

it sunk many, and a whole pile of jap airplanes.

 

it could be a remod of the SO DAK class, or even an EBB

1 2 3 4 5 6 7