Keep it as it is, let some smaller fleets have some fun :)

This gives fleet's as myself a much better chance at HA's  

Keep it as it is, let some smaller fleets have some fun :)

This gives fleet's as myself a much better chance at HA's  

The week penalty should be removed too, let us let people play a game mode that keeps many people playing this game. I'm not bothered about harbour limits as long as there is a way for a fleet to have a HA every week, if they want. If abuse takes place TNF should be able to apply HA bans rather than the current blanket 1 week penalty for losing.

So if they own 2 let them give one up so they can attack or perhaps allow them to attack and instead of winning the harbour they can win the invested credits from the harbour. This will need additional thought on getting people to invest as rentals aren't worth it realy.

I would also hope with so many harbours some of the smaller fleets could have a go, might be nice for fleet leaders to have some gentlemans agreeement leaving 1 harbour for small fleets?

Needs more thought

keep the limit as it is. 2 is enough

makes fleets as well think of which harbour they want and in which to investigate if they own it.

i dont see the need to raise the limit

i agree with being able to give up a harbour. but then there should be a very big punishment like 3 weeks no declaration and huge amount of creds/points

There are quite a few points coming up here. I will start with the OP and say I do not think increasing the harbor limit to 3 will help at all. You will have the same stagnant gameplay as it is now. Many examples including owning 3 and never getting attacked have been given. By keeping the limit 2 you have more for the many other fleets, and possibly an increase in gameplay. Maybe it will bring about some alliances to take after the mega....

I have heard some other good suggestions, such as eliminating the 1 week penalty. I agree with this wholeheartedly. I fail to see the benefit of penalizing a fleet that makes a go at it, merely for not winning??!! I think this might increase the chances of declaration if there is no penalty. Can someone give me an example of how you could abuse the declaration system? That confuses me a bit.

Thirdly I saw a point about "surrendering" harbors. Sadly if you really think about it, there are plenty of ways to "surrender" a Harbor. I can think of several ways right off the top of my head. I do not think that surrendering a Harbor should result in a penalty though.

The main goal of more harbors is to give more players (fleets) the HA "experience" which is fantastic, and the more that play and enjoy the higher the likelihood of things continuing to grow instead of turning to "pond slime" Just my 2 cents.