[QUOTE=maxflo]
[QUOTE=AdmHoliday]
[QUOTE=maxflo]
[QUOTE=SSN762]
[QUOTE=maxflo]
[
Yes, yes it is..... 3+3=97.4 correct ?
[/QUOTE]
Translation: "I have nothing to add but want to be a cool guys sidekick."
[/QUOTE]
OK, Ill dumb it down for you then....
To think BS took a harbor because we knew it had bugged rentals and then we would have a advantage is, other than your post, the stupidest thing I think I have read on these forums in a long time...
[/QUOTE]
Hmmmm....In more clear English, appropriate for a lower level reader and I may have not been clear at all, I said that they wanted the harbor for the fact of the OP'd ships and the possibility of additional SDE mess ups giving other advantages to the line. In addition to that, I don't blame you for wanting it as most of the fleets would. It's a popular nation at the moment because of these known problems, which makes it a great harbor to own. Lastly, with such a monumental (is that too big a word?) mistake of the rentals, BS should not bring them out for use until it is corrected which would be the right thing to do.
For even lower level readers: IT makes perfect sense for BS to want the harbor. We all woulnd't mind having it. BS should not use the rentals until fixed.
It's either these reasons or they serve really good wine and pasta at the Harbor Officers Club. ;-)
[/QUOTE]
OK, one more time.... Ill dumb it down for you again....
To think BS took a harbor because we knew it had bugged rentals and then we would have a advantage is, other than your post, the stupidest thing I think I have read on these forums in a long time...
[/QUOTE]
hmmmm....let's put it this way. Would you please report to the class in which students wear helmets starting tomorrow. I have not said they knew it had bugged rentals.
Also....the short bus will more than gladly deliver you to your home after school. TY...