|
|
-
Italian Rentals
07. 08. 2012 07:26
Subman99
|
And just when you thought the RM BB4 was the example of ridiculous.....now we see RM rentals....120+ knots......HOW was this nation releaased?.....DO NOT claim that the ship line was tested....clearly thats a lie, and looking at the previous post about this...which was locked...why? by the way?...to say RIDICULOUS is putting it mildly...and the comment that the players have been asked to return the rentals.....lol....sorry...this just makes the case that Italy should be pulled period! cant wait to see what the RM BB4 RENTAL will be like....just watched a RM BB2 RENTAL that was AROMOR WHORED doing 48 knots and sank nearly every ship in the GB...doing almost 400K attack....to say goodbye to game balance is putting things mildly.....thanks SDE/TNF for a truly EPIC FAIL.....now go ahead and lock and delete this before too many read this.
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 09. 2012 16:59
CNR4806
|
Originally Posted by Sindher
Originally Posted by CNR4806
Originally Posted by Sindher
Any fleet could have gotten the harbour and exploited it. Oh, you've seen a handful of BS members using them? You should be thankful. There's nothing stopping us from completely disrupting your NF time by flooding rooms with them. TNF? We clearly control them.
The bottom line is though, nobody bothered testing the new content and it's quite clear SDE don't give a flying pig about it neither.
P.S. Flota Chile? You brought a 80+ guys to a fight against 40 odd. Congrats. You've defeated the best HA fleet ever. I bet AA could take it from you with ease.
Summarization of the quoted post: We intentionally destroyed part of your NF experience, and you should be thankful for us not completely ruining it.
The logic behind it: I robbed 70% of your money, you should be thankful that I did not rob all of them.
Anyone see the problem here?
The last time you logged in was 29/06/12. We've ruined your NF experience? You have to log in for that to happpen.
You're avoiding my question. How the hell can "I robbed 70% of your money, you should be thankful that I did not rob all of them." be a sound argument?
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 09. 2012 17:01
Sindher
|
Originally Posted by flotanibor
Originally Posted by Sindher
P.S. Flota Chile? You brought a 80+ guys to a fight against 40 odd. Congrats. You've defeated the best HA fleet ever. I bet AA could take it from you with ease.
Ironic, considering everyone knows the singular reason why BS can hold harbors.
Ahh, believing the old myth that BS has massive numbers. IIRC, the last few fleets have reached our Harbour Tile. Quality >> Quantity. P.S. Why post from an alt account?
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 09. 2012 18:32
myg0t1
|
Originally Posted by KinGWaR
Its not exploiting a glitch in the game, not hacking, not cheating. Its using a function that wasnt tested and rushed into the live servers. Its a mistake. mistakes arent glitch or hacks or bugs, they are signs of not carring and poor work by the SDE.
Definition of glitch:
1 a : a usually minor malfunction <a glitch in a spacecraft's fuel cell>; also : 2bug 2 b : a minor problem that causes a temporary setback : snag
2 : a false or spurious electronic signal
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glitch
now idk about you king, but this seems like a synonym for mistake.....
by using these ships, you are giving an unfair advantage to your team, that would not exist under normal circumstances.
While nobody here is holding you accountable for the mistake, you certainly arent helping your fleets image by consistently using it to give your team an advantage.
The RM nation is heavily OP, there is no argument there, the RM RBB's tho are heavily OP. There is no reason a BB should be able to do 80+ knots under any circumstances.
By using this ship to give your team an unfair advantage against an opponent, you are taking advantage of a known bug, and thus exploiting it.
and just in case you arent clear to the definition of exploit:
1 : to make productive use of
you are certainly making productive use of your OP ship while you still have it, and THAT is why people are very agitated with you.
BTW you can hide behind the hypothetical of "anyone else would do the same thing" all you want, fact is YOU are the one doing it, which is why people arent happy at all.
As for the comment regarding all of BS using the exploit, I would welcome it, as it would mean there is a fighting chance for BOTH sides.
There is no reason at all 1 ship should be able to sink half of an entire team in under 3 mins b/c it can travel faster than NF physics allow.
If in the unlikely event you have ceased using this ship, i applaud you, for it indeed does show BS has some class left.
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 09. 2012 19:03
maxflo
|
[QUOTE=myg0t1]
Originally Posted by KinGWaR
Its not exploiting a glitch in the game, not hacking, not cheating. Its using a function that wasnt tested and rushed into the live servers. Its a mistake. mistakes arent glitch or hacks or bugs, they are signs of not carring and poor work by the SDE.
Definition of glitch:
1 a : a usually minor malfunction <a glitch in a spacecraft's fuel cell>; also : 2bug 2 b : a minor problem that causes a temporary setback : snag
2 : a false or spurious electronic signal
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/glitch
now idk about you king, but this seems like a synonym for mistake.....
by using these ships, you are giving an unfair advantage to your team, that would not exist under normal circumstances.
While nobody here is holding you accountable for the mistake, you certainly arent helping your fleets image by consistently using it to give your team an advantage.
The RM nation is heavily OP, there is no argument there, the RM RBB's tho are heavily OP. There is no reason a BB should be able to do 80+ knots under any circumstances.
By using this ship to give your team an unfair advantage against an opponent, you are taking advantage of a known bug, and thus exploiting it.
and just in case you arent clear to the definition of exploit:
1 : to make productive use of
you are certainly making productive use of your OP ship while you still have it, and THAT is why people are very agitated with you.
BTW you can hide behind the hypothetical of "anyone else would do the same thing" all you want, fact is YOU are the one doing it, which is why people arent happy at all.
As for the comment regarding all of BS using the exploit, I would welcome it, as it would mean there is a fighting chance for BOTH sides.
There is no reason at all 1 ship should be able to sink half of an entire team in under 3 mins b/c it can travel faster than NF physics allow.
If in the unlikely event you have ceased using this ship, i applaud you, for it indeed does show BS has some class left.
[/QUOTE]
I wonder if they are going to fix the BB4 while they are at it ? You know, the ship 1/2 the server uses...
oh ya, BS doesnt believe in "class"
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 09. 2012 20:45
CNR4806
|
Originally Posted by ajb7988
Originally Posted by CNR4806
Originally Posted by Sindher
Originally Posted by CNR4806
Originally Posted by Sindher
Any fleet could have gotten the harbour and exploited it. Oh, you've seen a handful of BS members using them? You should be thankful. There's nothing stopping us from completely disrupting your NF time by flooding rooms with them. TNF? We clearly control them.
The bottom line is though, nobody bothered testing the new content and it's quite clear SDE don't give a flying pig about it neither.
P.S. Flota Chile? You brought a 80+ guys to a fight against 40 odd. Congrats. You've defeated the best HA fleet ever. I bet AA could take it from you with ease.
Summarization of the quoted post: We intentionally destroyed part of your NF experience, and you should be thankful for us not completely ruining it.
The logic behind it: I robbed 70% of your money, you should be thankful that I did not rob all of them.
Anyone see the problem here?
The last time you logged in was 29/06/12. We've ruined your NF experience? You have to log in for that to happpen.
You're avoiding my question. How the hell can "I robbed 70% of your money, you should be thankful that I did not rob all of them." be a sound argument?
Because we could have taken 75% if we wanted.
Doesn't change the fact that you have taken the money from others, which does not belong to you. ie This doesn't justify your claim that it's perfectly okay to exploit design error.
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 10. 2012 04:44
Sindher
|
Originally Posted by CNR4806
You're avoiding my question. How the hell can "I robbed 70% of your money, you should be thankful that I did not rob all of them." be a sound argument?
How can you argue about being robbed of your NF Experience if you haven't logged in for over a week?
Also, you should be thankful you have 30% of your money instead of it all being robbed.
|
-
Re : Italian Rentals
07. 10. 2012 19:13
CNR4806
|
Originally Posted by Sindher
Originally Posted by CNR4806
You're avoiding my question. How the hell can "I robbed 70% of your money, you should be thankful that I did not rob all of them." be a sound argument?
How can you argue about being robbed of your NF Experience if you haven't logged in for over a week?
Also, you should be thankful you have 30% of your money instead of it all being robbed.
When did I specify it's only MY NF experience that got robbed? I don't recall doing so.
Yeah, I'll be glad that I have 30% left, but not thankful to the robber himself who demanded my thank you for robbing 70% of my money "only".
|
|
|
