Welcome to the frustration of the KM(with worse rep but better engies)
The Vanny is fine, I like it that some UK players actually get the chance to learn how to hold a line and play using your range instead of typical "fictory" tactics or AW noobs.
jeez isn't the UK line strong enough with the L2? Isn't it worth it grinding your way to L2?...try the H39 for a change. Atleast with this version of the H39, you grind your way to a great ship, unlike the H39. L2>>>>>>>H44.
The calibers aka larger guns means NOTHING against armor. The are only two things that are a factor. 1) shell damage 2) angle higher of both means better performance against armor.
Why do you think Yamato's, L2's and Montana's don't need to use AP at max angle and H44 doesn't? simple, H44 has low angle and low shell damage while L2's has the highest, then yamato then montana then alsace. btw, alsace has 18.9" guns and believe me, alsace's HE does nothing against AW L2.
The vanny has slightly more range then Iowa and about the same as yamato. since it has better repair, and actually has better spread and firepower then H39, it's only fair for it to has slightly less range then H39.
The turning rate is fine, all 4 gunned BB's seems to give the illusion that they have bad turning rate. The reason is simple, those ships are longer then others. longer ships means longer "behind" when turning. H44 for example has the same turning rate as L2, monty, alsace and yamato. yet it SEEMS as if it has less. you can look at these spec's everytime you buy a new ship.
|