ID
Password
FlashGuide
FlashGuide
HA Infomation

Suggestions

  Index

  • Remove Sonar From CVs

    04. 22. 2013 11:18

Recommend : 112

PictWarrior1

 

Please explain to me why CVs in NF have the ability to use sonar?  Do we no longer start players out in ASW capable ships?  Are we telling them that we have no use for teamwork savvy players who wish to escort capital ships? 

 

A support ticket on this subject told me that because CVs did not have the ability to see submarines when the game started, that they were given sonar to counter the submarine threat.  Well BBs, BCs, and CAs can't see submarines either so when will they be given sonar?  In fact, just remove the need for sonar altogether and allow everyone to see submarines no matter where they are.

 

Never in the history of mankind has sonar ever been successfully implemented on a carrier.  Capital ships make entirely too much self-noise.  If a CV were to be fitted with sonar, the only thing it would hear would be the sound of its own screws and engines.  Nevermind the sound of catapults, aircraft engines and propellers, steam, and arrestor cables and machinery. 

 

The idea of a CV being sonar capable is completely laughable.  And don't give me crap about NF =/= RL.  There has to be some basis in reality or we'd be using rail guns, jets, and satellite superlasers.

 

How am I qualified to argue against CVs using sonar?  I was a Sonar Technician in the United States Navy.  I know exactly how loud a CV is.  We could hear one pulling out of San Diego when our DDG was just leaving Hawaii.  It's no secret.

 

So what big spending, influential CV player cried to the GMs and managed to convince them that the loudest class of warship on the planet is sonar capable?  Because I want to cry to that same GM that my New York should be able to bounce Kaiser shells.  After all, a QV can, why shouldn't  my ebb1?

 

Or, if CVs should continue to use sonar, lets just let everyone use it and remove the lower level ASW ships from the game entirely.  If we are going to remove their purpose, why not remove them entirely?

 

Oh, and for the record:  I don't drive subs so this isn't a long-winded complaint about being sunk by a CV that could see me.

 

This is just an argument for sanity, common sense, and game balance.

 

 

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 22. 2013 23:45


Kriegsmarin

Originally Posted by facepalm

Originally Posted by Kriegsmarin

Originally Posted by SylverXI

Ever heard of Escort carriers?

CV's where used to counter SS in WWII. Unless they give planes the ability to detect SS, I say, CV's should have the ability to equip Sonar.(which is more fair than spamming sonar-able planes)

 



hahhhahahhahahhahahahhhahahahhahahahahha what a newb

you realy think planes had sonar in ww2 ahhahhahahhahahha

Escort carrier is created that conwoys can have air protection in black gap of atlantik where aircrafts from that time coudnt fly from ground bases
Planes of ww2 was fit with radar and subs of ww2 was 99% on surface , they dived only for action or to hide from enemy units

This newb make my day ahhhhahhahahhahhhahhhhhahahhhahahahhahahhhaha

I will give you advice mate rather check history facts before you post such funny untrue content

hahhahhahhahahhahahhhahhahhahhhhhahahahahahahhahhahahhaha




actually planes did have sonor althou not in the sense that you would think called sonobouys that PBYs droped via the air and it is a wwII plane.( althou not carrier based obviously b/c of thier size ). A sonobouy is pretty much a long tube that breaks apart in the water and acts as a sonar. The technology hasnt changed much since then either.

you can read this article 

http://www.fas.org/programs/ssp/man/uswpns/air/asw/air_antisubwar.html



read beter that site and you will see plane with sonar didnt existed
ASW plane and plane with sonar is not same , plane was most succesfull asw in ww2 because sub was 2x faster on surface and subs didnt have radar sub crew duty was to spot ships which they can do only on surface , as i sayed sub was 99% on surface becouse she was alwayes hunting only german type XXI had sonar and radar but produced to late to talk about XXI as militery machine of ww2 .XXI went only on test mission no war patrol has bean made
With reading all german secret codes from enigma planes was alwayes comeing on subs which make tham most sucesfull asw of ww2 + whean sub hide from plane underwater  is slow and cant spot ships and conwoys will safely go to thier destination 

Main tactic of allied asw was to force u boat undrwater that conwoy can escape  

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 23. 2013 09:36


PictWarrior1

 

From that article:

"Although sonobuoys had been developed in 1941, the concept was not fully endorsed"

 

Sonobuoys were in prototype form only and were rarely used.  They are not something that this game should implement.  Honestly, shouldn't we be trying to get the game's existing content fixed before we start adding something as game-changing as sonobuoys?

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 24. 2013 04:29


flaggelant

Originally Posted by DeathAddict
People should remember that if they need a sonar ship then they should use an ff/ cl/ dd put a sonar man on then put the ship on escort. How hard is it to also just be weary of subs and watch the team chat. If you arent smart enough to watch the team chat or watch where subs spawn then you deserve to be sunk by a sub. A good cv player always knows what might be lurking around him/her. While it looks like it isnt fair for CVs to get sunk by a sub, its much more unfair that CVs will be able to spot subs without the aid of ASWs.


i'm actually one of the very few cv's that still use an escort (for sonar), when you play during the day, you can count the amount of escorts used effectively on 1 hand.


escorts & warning cv's that they're rushing or running into a sub
are things that used to be.. with the decline of brains used in a GB these things are no longer the standard.



i agree on fixing the content, and don't think the CV should be edited until the SS/ASW discussion is fininshed. Until then CV's should remain capable to function in an asw role, as they did in the war. 

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 24. 2013 07:56


PictWarrior1

Originally Posted by flaggelant



i agree on fixing the content, and don't think the CV should be edited until the SS/ASW discussion is fininshed. Until then CV's should remain capable to function in an asw role, as they did in the war. 

 

They did function in an asw role but not with sonar (because of course, they didn't have sonar).  They were out there with DE's and DDs.  They sent out planes to look for subs on the surface and were screened by their escort vessels.  The CVs themselves did not function as asw.  It was the planes they carried that did the job.

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 24. 2013 18:40


Sheimer

Originally Posted by klython

Scissor = BB

Paper = CV

St.one = SS

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BB > CV

CV > SS

SS > BB

 

hope you get the logic

 

well if you still argue then play CV with sonar in it instead of SS

 

 

 

BALANCE or you just wanted the SS pawn the rest of the enemy team

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 25. 2013 08:00


PictWarrior1

Originally Posted by Sheimer

BALANCE or you just wanted the SS pawn the rest of the enemy team

 

Are you paying attention to anything I've written?  Mabye even just one sentence?  The CV itself, as a ship, is not a threat to a submarine.  It is the planes that are the threat.  If a CV driver wants to be ASW, he should be watching the red dots as soon as they appear to see where the subs are going.  Then he launches his torpedo bombers and kills them while they are battling friendly subs.  If the sub is getting close, the escort that he should have with him will spot the submarine and the CV can launch HH or use bombers again.  Players in DDs and CLs should be escorting the battle line too, to spot subs as they get there and allow ships carrying ASW weapons to do the job.

 

There is no reason whatsoever to be putting sonar on a CV, mainly because there is no basis in any form of reality or any digital dimension for believing that sonar would, could, or should be operable in any meaningful way on a Carrier.

 

Get your head out of the clouds and read more carefully.

 

Furthermore, this rock-paper-scissor argument is ridiculous since any well-driven ship with the right kind of situation could expect to do well against any class of ship in the game.  I've lost count of the number of high level BBs that I've sunk with a Brooklyn and if BB is supposed to be better than CV, why are so many BBs killed by bombers?  And don't try to say that it's because AA ships aren't doing their job.  It's because a good BW CV is doing his job.

 

A well-driven CV has no need of sonar anyway, so get rid of it.

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 25. 2013 08:11


PictWarrior1

 

I did a little more research for your reading pleasure.  It turns out that there were two IJN CVs fitted with sonar in WWII, but:

 

"The Shokaku and Zuikaku were in most respects the best carriers built by the Japanese,...They were unusual in having a large Type O hydrophone or passive sonar under the bow, enabling them to detect hostile submarines, although this was only usable when going dead slow."

-Aircraft Carriers by Antony Preston, Galahad Books, New York, 1979, pg 52-53

 

So it seems that if NF insists upon keeping this silliness, than it should only be operable if the CV is traveling at less than maybe 5 kts or so.  Any faster and the CV will be producing too much noise to hear any submarines.  And since these were the only CVs to make any sort of use out of sonar, they should be the only CVs in NF that can do so.

 

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    07. 28. 2013 20:25


woodskier

Originally Posted by ajb7988

Sure, remove the sonar, but weren't aircraft able to spot subs while they were at periscope depth? If thats the case I say get rid of sonar and if a scout has light where an enemy sub is then they get lit up. All subs in this game operate at periscope depth if not in crit depth. Its realistic and solves your conundrum.




There were some designated super-slow un-armored planes that would carry either flares to mark SS heading or one depth charge, they had crude radar that could pick up the periscope, but  it was rare the plane actually ever saw its prey.  If the sub was a few days from safe waters, the plane/CV would usually win.  Plane was rarely launched from anything from the smallest, flimsyest CV.


SDE get rid of CV sonar and people would buy more PHH.    

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    01. 27. 2014 00:36


PictWarrior1

bump.  Still waiting for this stupidity to end.  There is no basis in any sort of reality or alternate dimension for a CV to have the ability to use sonar and until there is an ultra-quiet CV (not likely), there never will be.

  • Re : Remove Sonar From CVs

    01. 27. 2014 06:48


webster514

+1 

As CV player I would normally be oppose changes likes these but sonars on cvs should be eliminated. The best antisubmarine set up to run on the cv is HH on the cv, AA and sonarman on the escort. 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10